Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| report [2022/06/18 23:03] – [7.10 Tests and Results] team3 | report [2022/06/29 14:21] (current) – [3.3 Cost] team3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| |LCA|Life Cycle Analysis| | |LCA|Life Cycle Analysis| | ||
| |UC|Use Case| | |UC|Use Case| | ||
| + | |PV|PhotoVoltaic| | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 203: | Line 204: | ||
| ==== - Comparison between development solutions ==== | ==== - Comparison between development solutions ==== | ||
| - | During the initial phase of the project, we had to make two important decisions that affected further work. We had to decide whether we want to use QR codes or NFC, and if we want to create a web app or a mobile app. In order to make a decision we analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches. The fidings are presented in the Tables {{ref>tabelqr}}, {{ref>tabelnfc}}, {{ref> | + | During the initial phase of the project, we had to make two important decisions that affected further work. We had to decide whether we want to use QR codes or NFC, and if we want to create a web app or a mobile app. In order to make a decision we analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches. The fidings are presented in the Tables {{ref>tableqr}}, {{ref>tablenfc}}, {{ref> |
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| Line 347: | Line 348: | ||
| | [[https:// | | [[https:// | ||
| | [[https:// | | [[https:// | ||
| - | | |Total include delivery price | 635,94| | + | | |Total include delivery price | 635.94| |
| - | | |Total that we payed| 15,3| | + | | |Total that we payed| 15.30| |
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 1098: | Line 1099: | ||
| ^ Name ^ Units ^ Price [€] ^ Delivery/ | ^ Name ^ Units ^ Price [€] ^ Delivery/ | ||
| - | |[[https:// | + | |[[https:// |
| |Website creation|1|4000|-|4000| | |Website creation|1|4000|-|4000| | ||
| Line 1302: | Line 1303: | ||
| We have to pay attention to the use of the product but also to its production, the choice of raw materials, its delivery and finally its end of life. | We have to pay attention to the use of the product but also to its production, the choice of raw materials, its delivery and finally its end of life. | ||
| - | In order to address these issues we decided to use recyclable materials (aluminium), | + | In order to address these issues we decided to use recyclable materials (aluminium), |
| ==== - Liability ==== | ==== - Liability ==== | ||
| Line 1492: | Line 1493: | ||
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| <figure structdraw> | <figure structdraw> | ||
| - | {{:structural_drawing_png.png|}} | + | {{:: |
| < | < | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 1498: | Line 1499: | ||
| **Materials and simulations** | **Materials and simulations** | ||
| - | In order to make the stress and strain simulations, | + | In order to make the stress and strain simulations, |
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| Line 1507: | Line 1508: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | This way the three parts can be produced by press forming. Press forming is a production method that works well together with aluminium. A material which is suited for this product for its properties and price. In GRANTA Edupack there’s a few tools in order to pick out which material is most suited. For our material, it’s important that it has a high tensile strength in order to resist impact from people trying to destroy the product since it’s located in a public space. If we put all the different materials in a graph with density on the x-axis (since we want to make the product as light as possible) and tensile strength on the y-axis. We get a result which can be seen in figure | + | This way the three parts can be produced by press forming. Press forming is a production method that works well together with aluminium. A material which is suited for this product for its properties and price. In GRANTA Edupack there’s a few tools in order to pick out which material is most suited. For our material, it’s important that it has a high tensile strength in order to resist impact from people trying to destroy the product since it’s located in a public space. If we put all the different materials in a graph with density on the x-axis (since we want to make the product as light as possible) and tensile strength on the y-axis. We get a result which can be seen in Figure |
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| Line 1516: | Line 1517: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | The two materials that seemed to be most suited were Aluminium, 8091, T6 and Aluminium 5182, H19. In figure | + | The two materials that seemed to be most suited were Aluminium, 8091, T6 and Aluminium 5182, H19. In Figure |
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| <figure aluminium1> | <figure aluminium1> | ||
| - | {{ : | + | {{ : |
| < | < | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 1527: | Line 1528: | ||
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| <figure aluminium2> | <figure aluminium2> | ||
| - | {{ : | + | {{ : |
| < | < | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 1537: | Line 1538: | ||
| **Storm simulation** | **Storm simulation** | ||
| - | For the storm simulation there had to be an approximation of how much force a heavy wind will apply to our screen. According to a research done by Kroftman (ref) at a wind speed of 115 km/h (classified as a heavy storm) there’s a pressure of 640 N/m2. So after applying this pressure to the 3D model, the results of the simulation can be seen in figure | + | For the storm simulation there had to be an approximation of how much force a heavy wind will apply to our screen. According to a research done by Kroftman (ref) at a wind speed of 115 km/h (classified as a heavy storm) there’s a pressure of 640 N/m2. So after applying this pressure to the 3D model, the results of the simulation can be seen in Figure |
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| Line 1560: | Line 1561: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | Looking at the results the display is able to resist a heavy storm. The maximum stress put on the casing is 5,585e+07 N/m^2 while the Yield strength of the aluminium is about 4e+08 N/m^2. Looking at the displacement simulation, there’s a displacement of about 16mm maximum which is acceptable. | + | Looking at the results the display is able to resist a heavy storm. The maximum stress put on the casing is 5.585e+07 N/m^2 while the Yield strength of the aluminium is about 4e+08 N/m^2. Looking at the displacement simulation, there’s a displacement of about 16 mm maximum which is acceptable. |
| //Second version// | //Second version// | ||
| - | After critically looking at the simulations, | + | After critically looking at the simulations, |
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| Line 1590: | Line 1591: | ||
| **Beer bottle simulation** | **Beer bottle simulation** | ||
| - | To calculate the impact force of a beer bottle we assumed a beer bottle is 200 grams, it has a velocity of 30 km/h (which is very fast) and a collision distance of 10 mm. This means there’ll be an impact force of 694.4 N. For the calculation, | + | To calculate the impact force of a beer bottle we assumed a beer bottle is 200 g, it has a velocity of 30 km/h (which is very fast) and a collision distance of 10 mm. This means there’ll be an impact force of 694.4 N. For the calculation, |
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| Line 1600: | Line 1601: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | Using this impact force the results of the simulations can be seen in figure | + | Using this impact force the results of the simulations can be seen in Figure |
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| Line 1623: | Line 1624: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | The maximum stress is 5,623e+07 N/m^2 while the yield strength is 4e+08 N/m^2. This means the product is able withstand a beer bottle thrown at it at extreme speeds. | + | The maximum stress is 5.623e+07 N/m^2 while the yield strength is 4e+08 N/m^2. This means the product is able withstand a beer bottle thrown at it at extreme speeds. |
| ==== - Packaging Design ==== | ==== - Packaging Design ==== | ||
| - | In Figure {{ref> | + | In Figure {{ref> |
| - | The packaging is made from mycelium, a material that is produced from agricultural waste and mushrooms/ | + | The packaging is made from mycelium, a material that is produced from agricultural waste and mushrooms/ |
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| Line 1663: | Line 1664: | ||
| == - Audio Components == | == - Audio Components == | ||
| - | To attract the attention of a bypasser the system should be able to play some sounds. Table {{ref> | + | To attract the attention of a bypasser the system should be able to play some sounds. Table {{ref> |
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| Line 1685: | Line 1686: | ||
| | A | [[ https:// | | A | [[ https:// | ||
| | B | [[https:// | | B | [[https:// | ||
| - | | C | [[https:// | + | | C | [[https:// |
| |** D **| ** [[https:// | |** D **| ** [[https:// | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 1722: | Line 1723: | ||
| ^ Component ^ Price [€] ^ Picture ^ | ^ Component ^ Price [€] ^ Picture ^ | ||
| | [[https:// | | [[https:// | ||
| - | | [[https:// | + | | [[https:// |
| | [[https:// | | [[https:// | ||
| | [[https:// | | [[https:// | ||
| Line 1739: | Line 1740: | ||
| For the real project an all in one solution would be the best option, seeing as it would be unnecessarily complicated to have every function handled by a different component when there are options that combine everything. The progammability is also simplified, because the software is already connected to the hardware. [[https:// | For the real project an all in one solution would be the best option, seeing as it would be unnecessarily complicated to have every function handled by a different component when there are options that combine everything. The progammability is also simplified, because the software is already connected to the hardware. [[https:// | ||
| - | Overview of outdoor touch screens is presented in table {{ref> | + | Overview of outdoor touch screens is presented in Table {{ref> |
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| Line 1891: | Line 1892: | ||
| ==== - Functional Tests ==== | ==== - Functional Tests ==== | ||
| - | For both components of our project, the public display prototype and the app, some functional tests were carried out. These are the results of said tests. Table {{ref> | + | For both components of our project, the public display prototype and the app, some functional tests were carried out. These are the results of said tests. |
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | <table testconclusion> | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <WRAP box center centeralign 400px> | ||
| + | ^ Number ^ Test^ Results^ | ||
| + | |T1|Walking by the setup | Sounds were played | ||
| + | |T2|Letting different testers handle display application | Everything was clear and worked | | ||
| + | |T3|Letting different testers try the web application | successful runthrough of application| | ||
| + | |T4|Postman test: average request time| 168 ms - 182 ms | | ||
| + | |T5|Postman test: average request size| 2.23 KB | | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| <WRAP centeralign> | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| Line 1985: | Line 2000: | ||
| Regarding the design, the material choice can be optimized. The coating of epoxy makes it difficult to recycle the aluminium, so it's recommended to find a solution to this. This can be done by choosing a different type of coating, material or way of protecting the casing. | Regarding the design, the material choice can be optimized. The coating of epoxy makes it difficult to recycle the aluminium, so it's recommended to find a solution to this. This can be done by choosing a different type of coating, material or way of protecting the casing. | ||
| ===== Bibliography ===== | ===== Bibliography ===== | ||
| - | //Will be added automatically by citing, in the body of the report, entries specified in BibTeX format and stored in the http:// | ||
| - | PS - //If you have doubts on how to make citations, create captions, insert formulas, etc. visit this [[http:// | ||